|
The Polished Scholar
Through intermingled philosophical musings, Wilmon A. Christian III & Jonathan M. Cox sort out the mélange of life, one day at a time.
Thursday, March 13, 2014
Join me on Pinterest
Friday, February 28, 2014
Life, death, and Black maleness
Black boys are dying. Black men are dying. Yes, death is a reality for us all, however, a string of events within the last year involving the death of Black boys and men, particularly the manner in which they have died, (either at the hands of a racist or by suicide) has caused me to more acutely consider my own existential mortality as a Black man. Though normally inclined to introspection, I'd rather not visit the idea of finiteness within the context of being Black, as it is a matter extremely taxing on the psyche. As much as I would have preferred my mind to not be encumbered with that particular subject matter, this past summer found me yet again picking at those thoughts, especially in light of the Trayvon Martin trial and subsequent verdict. At the request of my friend, I wrote a reflection piece for her blog about the verdict. In that post I articulate my thoughts and feelings on the verdict, but also grapple with being both Black and male and the implications that may or may not have for life or death in 21st Century America. The post is provided for you below. Though long, I encourage you to read.
-WAC III-
-WAC III-
Saturday,
July 13, 2013 10:15pm-Georgetown, DC
Bumbling
around Georgetown, my good friend and I find a restaurant still open and
willing to seat us at this late hour. Intent on showing my boy a good time in
my city, I was glad to make good on our desired goal, seafood. After a few
ultra-pleasant exchanges between us and the restaurant staff, Calvin and I wait
in the lobby until we’re summoned to be seated. Heading to the bathroom my eye
catches the t.v.; it’s on CNN. “Oh yeh”, I think, “the Trayvon verdict is
supposed to come out this evening.” I pause. I watch. Silent, lips move, images
flicker, and words trek across the bottom of the screen. Not guilty. “Hmph”, I
shrug, “I’m not surprised.” Acting against my normal impulse, that moment found
me not wanting to wrestle with the implications or pontificate about race. I
just wanted to eat. For that moment, that hour or so of good fellowship, I
didn’t want my world disrupted. I wanted to enjoy good food, good service, and
the company of my good friend. He was oblivious to the ruling at that time and
quite honestly, I didn’t want it to influence the tenor of our conversation.
Tucking it away and content with not bringing it up again until I’d thoroughly
mulled it over, I went on about my
evening.
Not
guilty. Not surprised.
Saturday,
July 13, 11:45pm-U Street Corridor, DC
A ten
minute cab ride uptown finds us at U street. There’s a palpable energy brooding
in the atmosphere. It’s almost electric. I sense it when I step out of the cab.
Not sure if it’s due to the exaggerated number of folks in town for the Delta
convention or if it’s because it’s just another Saturday night in the city,
however, there is a something in the air that I can’t identify which keeps my
eyes glancing around in expectancy. Just then, a group of protestors bustle
down the street. “No justice”, “No peace” they chant. Signs about justice,
Trayvon, and the difference in value of Black and White life make their
appearance among the crew. Still not surprised at what I’m witnessing (it makes
sense to me that people would protest after an unfavorable verdict), I look at
my boy and he’s obviously shocked by the
news, yet he’s also ecstatic that he’s watching something like this unfold. A
lady who works for some radio station comes up to us holding a tape recorder
and asks us for our thoughts on the verdict. Immediately, Calvin starts on a
diatribe about the law being unfair, I hear him say “Black”, and then he kind
of fades out as I start thinking about what I’m going to say when she asks me.
My turn. With my “not surprised and my answer represents all of Black America”
disposition fully intact, I respond as honest as I possibly could at the moment
and say that I’m not surprised. Feeling like the words I was speaking were
ringing hollow, I remarked how I at least hope this will start the conversation
about race and the law in the United States.
I say something about calling for a critical examination of race and the
law, especially as the United States is becoming more racially and ethnically
diverse. The conversation ends, she thanks me for my time, and now I began
processing all that has taken place within the last three hours. The term
“second-class citizen” comes to mind and it sticks. Later on, I tried to
explain to my boys this feeling of second-class citizenship and how situations
like this serve to exacerbate and perpetuate that notion. I talked to them about
that strange place that we as Black folks still occupy. That place where as a
Black person, you hope the law will protect and provide justice, giving
credence to your human existence, yet you also contend with the historical
narrative and constant feeling that the law doesn’t fully protect your interest
as a person.
Not
guilty. Not surprised.
Sunday,
July 14 and Monday, July 15, 2013
Rhetoric.
Noise. Outcry. Numb. Debated with myself if I racialized the issue too much.
Monday finds the door to my office closed the entire day. I try to do work but it is to little avail, as I grapple with existential questions concerning my identity as a Black man.
Monday finds the door to my office closed the entire day. I try to do work but it is to little avail, as I grapple with existential questions concerning my identity as a Black man.
Not
guilty. Not surprised.
Tuesday,
July 16, 2013
As I try
to make sense of this thing, thoughts come to me and I jot them down. My day is
invaded with random pieces of phrases and thoughts regarding the case. Here’s
an excerpt from an email I sent to my mentor that day:
As
I write this email I'm poignantly reminded about the importance of our work,
that if even incrementally, stereotypes, perceptions, misunderstandings and knowledge
concerning Black people must be challenged and reshaped. May this be the
passion that both informs and guides our writing.
As my
parent’s only son, I wanted to reach out and hug them, letting them know that I
love them and that I care, let them know that I was still here. That day I
wanted more to reach out to and check up on the young Black boys and men in my
life. I wanted to let them know that they’re special and that I care because
that day it hit me. Trayvon could have easily been one of my students. He could
have been a young Black boy, fresh faced and wide-eyed, on his way to George
Washington University to sit in my classroom for the semester. He could’ve sat
in my office as we discussed what it means to be a young Black man at a
highly-selective PWI (Predominantly White Institution) and I would’ve told him
that he is capable, he belongs, and that I am excited about his success. I would've helped him navigate the
institution. I would've dapped him up. I would've told him I was proud. But now
that’s not possible. Reflecting on this, I was reminded about the space that
Black men in America occupy: at once both feared and hated, oft misunderstood,
recipients of undue scrutiny, always thought to be suspect. A space of being
othered instead of embraced. This is the reality of Black men. Earlier that day
I wrote this:
Frustration.
The angst, I feel it now. It makes sense to me why I should feel mad. On the
bus to work today I see Black men. Some are wearing caps and sneakers, others
suits and dress shoes. They span the spectrum and the common denominator is
that they're both Black and male. And as such, subject to be misperceived.
Kanye's Poplar Trees is blaring in my ear. A scowl invades my face. I
write. I get it. I'm upset because
others still view us, yes us, as a monolith and as a result of this monolithic
thinking, Trayvon could've been my o…
Wednesday,
July 17, 2013
So
what’s my resolve? It’s more so preventative in that I fervently hope my
thoughts, actions, interactions, work, and research challenge and reshape
stereotypes, perceptions, misunderstandings and knowledge concerning Black
people, so another Trayvon Martin will not be killed.
Thursday, February 27, 2014
Just Go...
I was chatting a moment ago with my fellow Scholar, and our blog came up. We talked about how we haven't posted in (cough) years, and speculated as to why not. We used to write so much, and fairly often. We wondered if our minds were simply too taxed in other areas - work, schools, etc. - to give us the bandwidth to blog like we used to do. I dismissed this idea quickly; when we started the blog, school and work were just as prominent in our lives as they are now (although we have since reversed roles: I the student; he the worker). Then a thought occurred to me: maybe we needed to go back to the beginning, to when we first started the blog. Originally, we created the blog to give ourselves space simply to write and share what we thought, about any and everything. We had no grand plans for it. We just wrote what was in our heads or on our hearts. Most of the first few posts were a few sentences long. Wisps of thought. Looking back, I believe these unfiltered snippets were like literary kindling, catching fire quickly, growing into blazing flames. We got hot. We got used to going off at a moment's notice, putting pen to paper (or more aptly, finger to key) and leaving the contents of our minds flashing brilliantly across the page in full forest fire fashion. But the desire to produce consistently at such a level became more of a burden than bliss, and our fire slowly burned down, until almost nothing remained. But as a phoenix rises from its own ashes, embers can be coaxed back to life...
I realized we needed to get back to the basics. To simply write, however and whenever the urge hits. To resist the pressure to "go off," and to simply "go..." Sometimes, you can get so caught up in trying to produce at such a high level that you get stalled, worrying more about the results as opposed to the process. The process is what makes the results, not the other way around. Sometimes, you need to stop worrying about doing great things, and just do...something.
This is the rebirth. The beginning. We'll stop trying to go off...and just go. Where will we end up? Well, that's the fun part...
-JMC-
I realized we needed to get back to the basics. To simply write, however and whenever the urge hits. To resist the pressure to "go off," and to simply "go..." Sometimes, you can get so caught up in trying to produce at such a high level that you get stalled, worrying more about the results as opposed to the process. The process is what makes the results, not the other way around. Sometimes, you need to stop worrying about doing great things, and just do...something.
This is the rebirth. The beginning. We'll stop trying to go off...and just go. Where will we end up? Well, that's the fun part...
-JMC-
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Directly to the Point
It occurred to me recently (as in, ten minutes ago) that
people very often describe themselves as “direct,” but in reality…they are not.
Alas, I have found myself in that category on many an occasion. But, I posit,
this happens most often not because I do not want to be a direct person, but
because social norms and individual situations dictate that I must not be a direct person. By ‘social
norms’ I mean that it is typically considered rude or insensitive when you are
too direct (of course varying based on context and culture), and by ‘individual
situations’ I mean situations with
individuals, where most of the people I interact with do not want me to be
direct (e.g., they will take it too personally). Therefore, as a rough
estimation I would say that 98% of the time I am not direct because I believe I
can’t be, and 11% of the time I am not direct because I am at heart a nice guy
who doesn’t want to hurt people’s feelings. (Yes, that is more than 100%, but
I’m allowing for some overlap of the two reasons. I can count, thank you.) But
this is outside the purview of my point.
Back to those who describe themselves as “direct,” but who
are not. Yes, I believe there are others who might describe their own
indirectness in the same fashion I did my own, but this is largely irrelevant.
I am speaking specifically about those who engage in interaction with an
explicit ‘other,’ and describe themselves as “direct,” possibly with a sentence
such as “I am a very direct person: I prefer to just tell it like it is, and
I’d rather you do the same with me. There’s no reason to ever beat around the
bush, just be straight up.” Many people who engage in this sort of self-imposed
attribution are probably not aware that they are lying. (Ok, that might
be a bit too direct and harsh: they are not telling the truth.) What they are
really saying is, “I prefer to be mostly
direct with you, most of the time.
But you should be completely direct with me. Mostly.” Very different statement.
And the reason I say people who really feel this way are not “direct” is
because if you are not completely
direct, then by definition you are indirect,
which is NOT DIRECT.
I’ll make my case in a couple quick ways. If you think about
“directness” on a moving scale, then at the far right you have “Direct” and the
far left you have “Indirect.” “But wait,” you say. “There are degrees of
directness – I can be somewhat direct
or very direct.” False. You cannot. There are varying degrees of indirectness only. Look at the
definition for the word “direct,” in its adverb form in which we use it in this
context: “proceeding in a straight line or by the shortest course; straight;
undeviating; not oblique;”1 “stemming
immediately from a source;” 2 “having no
compromising or impairing element.” 2 You will
see there is no room for being less than direct. Therefore, anything less than
or not completely direct is some
varying degree of indirect. To put it
another way, using a spatial analogy, if you said you were going to go directly
to the store, you only went directly there if you did not go or stop anywhere
else on the way. For those naysayers who would attempt to debunk this example
by saying that one could go directly
to the store using a circuitous route (i.e. take a longer route, but not make
any stops), I say again that this is indirect,
as it stands in direct opposition to the definition of direct. Direct is “by the shortest course,” or it is not direct.
Sorry.
I posit that those who claim they are “direct” people but
make relational “stops” or use “circuitous routes” with those to whom they
assert their directness are in actuality being some degree of “indirect.”
Possibly a low level, but still indirect at base. And therefore, not direct. Now, this isn’t a judgmental
thrashing of those to whom this applies. More of a call to thought: possibly
you should consider what you are really
saying, what you want to say, and how
you should classify/express yourself to others (particularly those who, like
me, would expect someone who told us they were going to be direct to actually be direct).
I believe “directness” gets a bad rap. Most people tend to
see being “direct” as being somehow insensitive, or thoughtless. I postulate
that it can be the exact opposite (although admittedly, not always; it depends
on the individual’s personality). Being direct typically requires some level of
forethought – how else would you know what the most direct route was? I think
indirect communication can sometimes be one of the greatest flaws of human
interaction. How can we expect others to know exactly what we mean or think if
we won’t tell them explicitly? Many a relationship (platonic, romantic,
familial, whatever) has probably been ruined, or in the least greatly strained,
unnecessarily, because people won’t talk to others with direction and purpose.
Don’t get me wrong, indirectness certainly has its place, but I think we should
use it like salt or alcohol – in moderation.
-JMC-
Monday, September 17, 2012
Developing the Whole Self
I recently had a conversation with a good friend that was
difficult, but in the end, very enlightening and uplifting. He spoke about
discontentment with his life: with his romantic endeavors, his current
intellectual pursuits, the direction of his life, everything. He described how
the other day, he participated in an activity I personally know for him has
been one of his greatest joys for years, yet he experienced not one ounce of
enjoyment on this occasion. He also said something that I believe was key: that
when he put his life in perspective, he could not think of one reason why he should be discontent – by most
standards, he is doing incredibly well, and many people would probably give almost
anything to be in his shoes (literally and figuratively) – but he still felt unhappy. He could not put his
finger on the source of his dissatisfaction with his life, but he felt it
acutely all the same.
I say this conversation was difficult for two reasons.
First, it was hard hearing a friend for whom I care deeply describing the pain
and struggle he was experiencing. Second, I completely understand how he feels,
because I have felt this way before myself. I am an excessive worrier by
nature, and have been prone to (and struggled with) depression as long as I can
remember. I’ve been in the place where I was completely unhappy with my life,
despite not being able to specify the origin of my discontent and all outward
signs being antithetical to me “needing” to feel that way. I literally felt my
friend’s pain, and that was difficult. But the conversation was also
enlightening and uplifting, because of the resultant discussion, and I believe
it was so for both my friend and me.
As we were talking, what stuck out to me was his comment
about not being able to pinpoint the source of his discontentment. Everything
on the outside was technically good, maybe even great, by most standards, which
to me pointed to something internal
that wasn’t in place. I talked to my friend about a few things I’ve noticed. He
has always been an intellectual, and makes sure he keeps his mind sharp by
consuming information, whether it’s technical knowledge for his job or
schooling, current events and politics, sports, or personal interests. He has
an enviable social life, consistently making time for friends, fellowship, and
fun. He also exercises regularly, and is conscientious about eating a healthy
diet. He takes care of himself well, mentally, socially, and physically…but
there was a piece I saw missing, which for me directly correlates with the internal self which for him was out of alignment:
spirituality.
So often we as humans seem to forget that we are beings made
up of multiple parts, and that in order to be whole, we need to maintain all of those parts. I believe that
essentially, there are four aspects to our wellbeing: physical, mental, social,
and spiritual. These can be further broken down into smaller divisions, which
many theories do, but in a gross sense, these cover everything. As humans we
have a physical body, and we have to take care of it. Almost everything we do
is executed through physical movement or processes. In fact, if these physical
processes ever stop working, you’re typically dead (for instance breathing – if
your lungs cease to work, you will either need a machine to do it for you, or
you will die). In the same way, we have to take care of our mental functions.
If you don’t keep your mind sharp by learning new things, or staying engaged in
those things you know, you will become stagnant and unproductive, and your life
will be that much harder. We humans are also social creatures; we exist in
relation to others. Yes, there are varying degrees to which people desire or
need contact with other people, but fundamentally we are built to work, play,
live, be with others, to be social.
But there is also an internal aspect to our nature: spirituality. People may
call it different things, but the essence remains the same – there is something
within each of us that makes us unique and different, that gives us life, often
referred to as a soul or spirit. And it needs to be maintained as well. So many
people do things to work on one or two aspects of their lives to the neglect of
other areas, and often the area that gets the least attention is the one that,
arguably, needs the most – the spirit. It’s when you neglect the spirit, the
internal, that everything on the outside can be going perfectly yet you still
feel unfulfilled.
For me, my spirituality manifests itself through my faith in
God, so that’s what I spoke to my friend about. I told him about how, when I
was experiencing a similar phase in my life (I should say phases, because it’s
happened more than once), while it was extremely helpful to have strong support
from my family and friends, what really brought me through was my faith in God,
that He was in control of my life and I could trust Him completely. There’s a
verse in the Bible that addresses worry and anxiety, Philippians 4:6, which
says that we should not worry about anything, but instead, through prayer (and
with thanks), present everything to God. What I shared with my friend
specifically though was the verse that follows that, verse 7, which states:
“and the peace of God, which
transcends all understanding, will guard your heart and mind.” For me, that
verse is applicable to more than just worry. My friend described a feeling that
he could not specifically pinpoint that was causing him to be discontent – a
feeling that he could not understand.
In a situation like that, you need a peace that transcends all understanding, and God promises that if you bring
things to Him through prayer, He will give you that peace. I suggested that my
friend actively work on that part of his life, his spiritual wellbeing, with
the same intentionality that I witness him pursuing the other aspects of his
life. And the same should be true for everybody else, myself included.
As I said previously, this was an enlightening and uplifting
conversation, for me as well. I say that for two reasons. One, I believe God
orchestrated this discussion in part to give me an occasion to share my faith
in a way in which I was comfortable. I am not shy about my beliefs, but unless
someone asks me about them I rarely go out of my way to share, because I never
want to be seen as a “pushy” Christian, or someone who is trying to thrust his beliefs
upon another – but I do recognize that as a Christian, I am called to tell
others about Christ. God knows me better than I know myself, and that I’ve been
thinking about this issue a lot, so he gave me the perfect chance to speak up
without feeling pushy. Second, this conversation gave me another reminder to
keep my own spiritual wellbeing in the forefront of my mind. I often fall into
the (unintentional) trap of working on one aspect of my life to the neglect of
others, and constant reminders help me stay fresh in my commitment to my own
development.
I truly believe that it is important for
everybody to find some spiritual grounding, whatever that means for them
individually. That can be through some organized religion, or many other
outlets. If for you that is a religious affiliation, are you reading your
Bible, Quran, or whatever holy text you follow? Are you meeting regularly with
others who share your beliefs? Are you praying, or maybe just sitting quietly
and meditating? It’s crucial that you find whatever that thing is for you, and
you actively develop it, for your own wellbeing. If you work on this
foundational aspect of your life, you will likely find that everything else
seems to fall into place much more easily…and in turn, you will probably be
much more content.
-JMC-
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)